Johnson v. Johnson

138 A.D.2d 958
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1988
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 958 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Johnson, 138 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Order insofar as appealed from [959]*959unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application denied. Memorandum: The court’s award of temporary child support must be reversed. Defendant proceeded by order to show cause. Plaintiff’s attorney was served with the order to show cause four days before its return date. When he tried to contact plaintiff, who is a teacher, he discovered that she was out of town attending an educational seminar and was not expected back until after the return date. Plaintiff’s attorney submitted an affidavit apprising the court of plaintiffs absence and requesting an adjournment. The court denied the request for an adjournment although there was no evidence that a short delay would result in economic hardship to the children. Under these circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of the court’s discretion to decide the motion on the merits. Moreover, it is apparent from the record that defendant is possessed of sufficient financial resources to support the parties’ two children during the pendency of this action. An award of child support should await defendant’s compliance with outstanding discovery demands. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Horey, J. — support.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.2d 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1988.