Johnson v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Johnson

55 A.D.2d 605, 389 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15320

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 605 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Johnson, 55 A.D.2d 605, 389 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered September 28, 1976, which modified a prior order of the same court, dated July 21, 1976, by (1) temporarily reducing the amount of support payable thereunder to the amount of $150 per week, (2) providing that such amount be payable through a wage deduction order and (3) directing that [606]*606petitioner collect rent from a tenant. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the support payments to the amount of $100 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On this record, the support payments directed to be made by the Family Court were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Shapiro and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered September 28, 1976, which modified a prior order of the same court, dated July 21, 1976, by (1) temporarily reducing the amount of support payable thereunder to the amount of $150 per week, (2) providing that such amount be payable through a wage deduction order and (3) directing that [606]*606petitioner collect rent from a tenant. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the support payments to the amount of $100 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On this record, the support payments directed to be made by the Family Court were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Shapiro and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 605, 389 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack