Johnson v. Johnson

15 A.D.2d 762, 224 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11385

This text of 15 A.D.2d 762 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Johnson, 15 A.D.2d 762, 224 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Under the circumstances of this case the alternative direction for an open commission was warranted. However, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to impose the total burden of the expenses upon defendant at this Stage of the proceedings. Only if plaintiff is eventually successful in the action Should defendant be compelled to reimburse her for the expense of the attendance of her attorney at the examination to the extent indicated above. (See Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 262 App. Div. 708.) Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
262 A.D. 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 762, 224 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1962.