Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Johnson v. Johnson

2 N.J.L. 138

DecidedNovember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J.L. 138 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Johnson, 2 N.J.L. 138 (N.J. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

State of demand insensible. No judgment, proceedings null.

The reason relied on for the reversal of the judgment of the justice, is as follows, to wit: Because the state of the demand filed by the plaintiff before the justice, [102] is insensible, and contains no cause of action. The state of demand is as follows:

[f] There was a jury trial and verdict for the plaintiff below, for twenty dollars; but no judgment rendered. The court were of opinion, that the state of demand was too uncertain, to render a judgment on; and, therefore, set aside and made null and void the proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of demand insensible. No judgment, proceedings null.

The reason relied on for the reversal of the judgment of the justice, is as follows, to wit: Because the state of the demand filed by the plaintiff before the justice, [102] is insensible, and contains no cause of action. The state of demand is as follows:

[f] There was a jury trial and verdict for the plaintiff below, for twenty dollars; but no judgment rendered. The court were of opinion, that the state of demand was too uncertain, to render a judgment on; and, therefore, set aside and made null and void the proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J.L. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-nj-1806.