Johnson v. Johnson

848 S.W.2d 644, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 360, 1993 WL 73863
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1553
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1993·No. No. 62213·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion to modify a previous decree of dissolution, a motion for contempt and a motion for revival of judgment. Respondent filed a cross-motion to modify the decree of dissolution. After a hearing, the court denied the appellant’s motions and respondent’s motion and awarded respondent her attorney’s fee and costs of litigation. Court costs were taxed to appellant. From this judgment, appellant appealed.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. Our standard of review is governed by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.1976). We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Johnson, 848 S.W.2d 644, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 360, 1993 WL 73863 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

848 S.W.2d 644 (Johnson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)