Johnson v. Johnson

141 S.E. 924, 37 Ga. App. 788, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 617
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1928
Docket18058
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 S.E. 924 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Johnson, 141 S.E. 924, 37 Ga. App. 788, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 617 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. An award partitioning land, made by arbitrators agreed upon by the tenants in common for such purposes, and showing that the parties intended to carry out the award by the execution of deeds, and not to have it made the judgment of the court, is a common-law award, and is not invalid by reason of a failure to pursue the statutory provisions required in proceedings for statutory awards.

2. After a common-law award has been made, the duties of the arbitrators have ceased, and they have no power to rescind or annul the award.

3. The award is a complete defense against a proceeding brought by one of the tenants in common to partition the land. The court therefore did not err in refusing to appoint partitioners and in dismissing the application for partition.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rose v. Moore
377 S.W.2d 372 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E. 924, 37 Ga. App. 788, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-johnson-gactapp-1928.