Johnson v. Johnson

93 S.E. 1027, 21 Ga. App. 167, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 496
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 1, 1917·No. 8525·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

1. A decision on the first writ of error is binding as the law of the case on a second writ of error.. Gray v. Conyers, 70 Ga. 349; King v. Davidson, 72 Ga. 192; Saulsbury v. Iverson, 73 Ga. 733; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Third National Bank, 125 Ga. 489 (54 S. E. 621); Southern Bell Tel. Co. v. Glawson, 140 Ga. 507 (79 S. E. 136).

2. The law of this particular case having been fixed and determined in its formet adjudication by this court (Johnson v. Johnson, 14 Ga. App. 194, 80 S. E. 660), the overruling of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Johnson, 93 S.E. 1027, 21 Ga. App. 167, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 496 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

93 S.E. 1027 (Johnson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. Conyers
70 Ga. 349 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)
King v. Davidson
72 Ga. 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)
Saulsbury, Respess & Co. v. Iverson
73 Ga. 733 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Third National Bank
54 S.E. 621 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Glawson
79 S.E. 136 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Johnson v. Johnson
80 S.E. 660 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)