Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Johnson v. Johnson

93 S.E. 1027, 21 Ga. App. 167, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 496

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 1, 1917

Docket8525

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 1027 (Johnson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Johnson, 93 S.E. 1027, 21 Ga. App. 167, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 496 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

1. A decision on the first writ of error is binding as the law of the case on a second writ of error.. Gray v. Conyers, 70 Ga. 349; King v. Davidson, 72 Ga. 192; Saulsbury v. Iverson, 73 Ga. 733; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Third National Bank, 125 Ga. 489 (54 S. E. 621); Southern Bell Tel. Co. v. Glawson, 140 Ga. 507 (79 S. E. 136).

2. The law of this particular case having been fixed and determined in its formet adjudication by this court (Johnson v. Johnson, 14 Ga. App. 194, 80 S. E. 660), the overruling of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI