Johnson v. Johnson
14 Cal. 459
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J. concurring.
This is a suit for a divorce. The defendant is charged in the complaint with adultery and with extreme cruelty. The evidence relates exclusively to the latter charge. We do not see how the decree of the Court below could have been different. The conduct of the plaintiff was well calculated to provoke the ill treatment of which she complains; and such treatment cannot, therefore, be urged by her as a ground for divorce. (See Bishop on Marriage and Divorce, Sec. 491.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Johnson, 14 Cal. 459 (Cal. 1859).
14 Cal. 459 (Johnson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schulze v. Schulze
206 Cal. App. 2d 330 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
De Burgh v. De Burgh
250 P.2d 598 (California Supreme Court, 1952)
Farmer v. Farmer
180 P.2d 55 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
Popescu v. Popescu
115 P.2d 208 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Spofford v. Spofford
108 P. 1054 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1910)
Masterman v. Masterman
51 P. 277 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1897)