Johnson v. Johnson
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Joshua Mitch Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00207-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 2337994 (W.D.Va. July 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
353 F. App'x 827 (Johnson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.