Johnson v. Johnson

353 F. App'x 827
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2009·No. No. 09-7454·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Mitch Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00207-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 2337994 (W.D.Va. July 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Johnson, 353 F. App'x 827 (4th Cir. 2009).

353 F. App'x 827 (Johnson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)