Johnson v. Jensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Johnson v. Jensen

232 N.W. 922, 120 Neb. 865, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 248

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Jensen. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Neb. 1 →

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided November 14, 1930·No. No. 27354·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Kearney county to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained in a collision with defendant’s automobile. A verdict was returned in favor of defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment’ of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Kearney county to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained in a collision with defendant’s automobile. A verdict was returned in favor of defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment’ of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Johnson v. Jensen, 232 N.W. 922, 120 Neb. 865, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 248 (Neb. 1930).

Pincite

232 N.W. 922 (Johnson v. Jensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.