Johnson v. Jackson

Third Circuit

Johnson v. Jackson

173 F.2d 223

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 27, 1949·No. No. 9717·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not find in this case any issue of law or fact which was not satisfactorily discussed and disposed of by the opinion of the District Court. 82 F.Supp. 915. We, therefore, affirm on that opinion. Judge O’Connell would not give the plaintiff interest or costs in this Court. To that extent he dissents. He does, however, join in affirmance subject to the exception mentioned.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not find in this case any issue of law or fact which was not satisfactorily discussed and disposed of by the opinion of the District Court. 82 F.Supp. 915. We, therefore, affirm on that opinion. Judge O’Connell would not give the plaintiff interest or costs in this Court. To that extent he dissents. He does, however, join in affirmance subject to the exception mentioned.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Johnson v. Jackson, 173 F.2d 223 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

173 F.2d 223 (Johnson v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related