Johnson v. Jackson

Third Circuit

Johnson v. Jackson

173 F.2d 223

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 1949

DocketNo. 9717

StatusPublished

This text of 173 F.2d 223 (Johnson v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Jackson, 173 F.2d 223 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not find in this case any issue of law or fact which was not satisfactorily discussed and disposed of by the opinion of the District Court. 82 F.Supp. 915. We, therefore, affirm on that opinion. Judge O’Connell would not give the plaintiff interest or costs in this Court. To that extent he dissents. He does, however, join in affirmance subject to the exception mentioned.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not find in this case any issue of law or fact which was not satisfactorily discussed and disposed of by the opinion of the District Court. 82 F.Supp. 915. We, therefore, affirm on that opinion. Judge O’Connell would not give the plaintiff interest or costs in this Court. To that extent he dissents. He does, however, join in affirmance subject to the exception mentioned.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 F.2d 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-jackson-ca3-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack