Johnson v. Jackson, 89934 (1-31-2008)
This text of 2008 Ohio 323 (Johnson v. Jackson, 89934 (1-31-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} The court did not abuse its discretion by granting the motion for relief from judgment. The magistrate's decision, as adopted by the court, confirmed Jackson's claim that he did not receive notice of the trial date. This constituted grounds for relief under the catch-all provision of Civ.R. 60(B)(5). See Riley v. Cleveland TelevisionNetwork, Cuyahoga App. No. 83752,
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant his costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Cleveland Municipal Court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. *Page 4
*Page 1COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, P.J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 Ohio 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-jackson-89934-1-31-2008-ohioctapp-2008.