Johnson v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
This text of 220 A.D. 721 (Johnson v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order setting aside verdict reversed upon the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated, upon the ground that the evidence justified the inference [722]*722that the box which obstructed the passenger’s exit was last seen by defendant’s servant and in the control and possession of defendant. The defendant vouchsafed no explanation of the character of the box and offered no evidence that it was not an article belonging to the defendant or to one of its employees and utilized in defendant’s business. Kelly, P. J., Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., dissent upon the ground that plaintiff failed to show that defendant was responsible for the presence of the box.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappdiv-1927.