Johnson v. Immerman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Johnson v. Immerman

139 So. 2d 475, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3493

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 1962

DocketNo. 61-556

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 2d 475 (Johnson v. Immerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Immerman, 139 So. 2d 475, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, seeks review of an order of the trial judge granting defendants’ motion for new trial solely on [476]*476the issue of damages. The appellant has failed to demonstrate, from this record, that the trial judge abused his discretion. Therefore, the order is affirmed. See: Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 740; McLoughlin v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co., Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 560.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, seeks review of an order of the trial judge granting defendants’ motion for new trial solely on [476]*476the issue of damages. The appellant has failed to demonstrate, from this record, that the trial judge abused his discretion. Therefore, the order is affirmed. See: Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 740; McLoughlin v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co., Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 560.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 2d 475, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-immerman-fladistctapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack