Johnson v. Immerman
139 So. 2d 475, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3493
Opinion
Appellant, plaintiff below, seeks review of an order of the trial judge granting defendants’ motion for new trial solely on [476]*476the issue of damages. The appellant has failed to demonstrate, from this record, that the trial judge abused his discretion. Therefore, the order is affirmed. See: Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 740; McLoughlin v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co., Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 560.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Immerman, 139 So. 2d 475, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).
139 So. 2d 475 (Johnson v. Immerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority
131 So. 2d 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
MacLaughlin v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co.
133 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)