Johnson v. Ikerd

Indiana Supreme Court

Johnson v. Ikerd

48 Ind. 380

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 Ind. 380 (Johnson v. Ikerd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Ikerd, 48 Ind. 380 (Ind. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Buskirk, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants, upon two promissory notes. There was judgment for the appellee, upon the default of the appellants. There was no application in the court below to set aside the default, and consequently no question is presented for decision. Fish v. Baher, 47 Ind. 534. The judgment must be affirmed. The supersedefis having been set aside upon the motion of appellee, no damages can be assessed.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buskirk, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants, upon two promissory notes. There was judgment for the appellee, upon the default of the appellants. There was no application in the court below to set aside the default, and consequently no question is presented for decision. Fish v. Baher, 47 Ind. 534. The judgment must be affirmed. The supersedefis having been set aside upon the motion of appellee, no damages can be assessed.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Ind. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ikerd-ind-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack