Johnson v. Ikerd
48 Ind. 380
Opinion
This was an action by the appellee against the appellants, upon two promissory notes. There was judgment for the appellee, upon the default of the appellants. There was no application in the court below to set aside the default, and consequently no question is presented for decision. Fish v. Baher, 47 Ind. 534. The judgment must be affirmed. The supersedefis having been set aside upon the motion of appellee, no damages can be assessed.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Ikerd, 48 Ind. 380 (Ind. 1874).
48 Ind. 380 (Johnson v. Ikerd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baldwin v. Humphrey
75 Ind. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Reed v. Spayde
56 Ind. 394 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)