Johnson v. Horodesky
This text of Johnson v. Horodesky (Johnson v. Horodesky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AMBER JOHNSON, No. 85633 Appellant, vs. CHRISTOPHER M. HORODESKY, Respondent. FILE NOV 1 7 AVZ E VAR A. SROWN C eF = COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPUTY CLERK -
This is a pro se appeal from an order sealing the documents and record, apart from the final judgment, in this case. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Michele Mercer, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order such as that challenged by appellant. This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
, J. J. Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A 44SPID Z-Z- 36/ea cc: Hon. Michele Mercer, District Judge, Family Court Division Amber Johnson Carman & Price Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Horodesky, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-horodesky-nev-2022.