Johnson v. Hodges

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 2004
Docket03-21109
StatusUnpublished

This text of Johnson v. Hodges (Johnson v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Hodges, (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 7, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-21109 Summary Calendar

GORDON JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LAWRENCE HODGES, Warden II; CHARLES WILLIAMSON, Assistant Warden; RICHARD GUNNELS, Major; CRAIG FISHER, Captain; MR. ROSADO, Lieutenant; MONTGOMERY, Lieutenant; J. GUTIERREZ, Sergeant; B. CARDOZA, UGI Sergeant; V. J. GREIGER, Correction Officer; V. WILLIS KING, Correction Officer; GAIL THOMPSON, Law Library Supervisor; W. TAYLOR, Counsel Substitute; D. COLE, Warden I; M. MUNSELLE, Assistant Warden; JAMIE BAKER, Major; FREDERICK MERIDA, Captain; JOE PONDER, Captain; D. SNODGRASS; NELDA BUEHLER, UGI; ANTONIOUS FLANAGAN, Correctional Officer IV; W. SMITH, Correctional Officer IV; KELLI WARD, RGN V Griv INV; JANE M. COCKERHAM, Ombudsman; FRANK HOKE, ACT Administrator,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CV-3672 --------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gordon Johnson, Texas prisoner # 748915, appeals from the

district court’s pre-trial order striking his original civil

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-21109 -2-

rights complaint and directing him to file an amended, concise

complaint. This court does not have jurisdiction over this

appeal. See Click v. Abilene Nat’l Bank, 822 F.2d 544, 545 (5th

Cir. 1987). The collateral order doctrine does not apply to the

present case. See Exxon Chems. Am. v. Chao, 298 F.3d 464, 469

(5th Cir. 2002). Johnson’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson v. Hodges, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-hodges-ca5-2004.