Johnson v. Hodges
This text of Johnson v. Hodges (Johnson v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 7, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-21109 Summary Calendar
GORDON JOHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LAWRENCE HODGES, Warden II; CHARLES WILLIAMSON, Assistant Warden; RICHARD GUNNELS, Major; CRAIG FISHER, Captain; MR. ROSADO, Lieutenant; MONTGOMERY, Lieutenant; J. GUTIERREZ, Sergeant; B. CARDOZA, UGI Sergeant; V. J. GREIGER, Correction Officer; V. WILLIS KING, Correction Officer; GAIL THOMPSON, Law Library Supervisor; W. TAYLOR, Counsel Substitute; D. COLE, Warden I; M. MUNSELLE, Assistant Warden; JAMIE BAKER, Major; FREDERICK MERIDA, Captain; JOE PONDER, Captain; D. SNODGRASS; NELDA BUEHLER, UGI; ANTONIOUS FLANAGAN, Correctional Officer IV; W. SMITH, Correctional Officer IV; KELLI WARD, RGN V Griv INV; JANE M. COCKERHAM, Ombudsman; FRANK HOKE, ACT Administrator,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CV-3672 --------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gordon Johnson, Texas prisoner # 748915, appeals from the
district court’s pre-trial order striking his original civil
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-21109 -2-
rights complaint and directing him to file an amended, concise
complaint. This court does not have jurisdiction over this
appeal. See Click v. Abilene Nat’l Bank, 822 F.2d 544, 545 (5th
Cir. 1987). The collateral order doctrine does not apply to the
present case. See Exxon Chems. Am. v. Chao, 298 F.3d 464, 469
(5th Cir. 2002). Johnson’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Hodges, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-hodges-ca5-2004.