Johnson v. Hodges
92 F. App'x 94
Opinion
Gordon Johnson, Texas prisoner # 748915, appeals from the district court’s pre-trial order striking his original civil rights complaint and directing him to file an amended, concise complaint. This court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Click v. Abilene Nat’l Bank, 822 F.2d 544, 545 (5th Cir.1987). The collateral order doctrine does not apply to the present case. See Exxon Chems. Am. v. Chao, 298 F.3d 464, 469 (5th Cir.2002). Johnson’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Hodges, 92 F. App'x 94 (5th Cir. 2004).
92 F. App'x 94 (Johnson v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Exxon Chemicals America v. Chao
298 F.3d 464 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Bobby S. Click v. Abilene National Bank (N/k/a Mbank Abilene, n.a.), and Oregone West, Inc.
822 F.2d 544 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)