Johnson v. Highland Hills Drive Apartments
This text of 568 S.W.2d 661 (Johnson v. Highland Hills Drive Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application for writ of error is refused with the notation, “NO REVERSIBLE ERROR.” The Court of Civil Appeals held that there is no implied warranty of habitability in Texas, and, on that basis, affirmed in part. Tex.Civ.App., 552 S.W.2d 493. Our opinion in Kamarath v. Bennett, 568 S.W.2d 658 (Tex.1978), has established such an implied warranty in this State under certain factual situations. However, the Court of Civil Appeals additionally held that even should a warranty of habitability be adopted in Texas, the facts of this ease dealing with the provision of mail facilities would not constitute a breach of such warranty. We agree.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 S.W.2d 661, 21 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 321, 1978 Tex. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-highland-hills-drive-apartments-tex-1978.