Johnson v. Hicks
119 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 43, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 715
Opinion
1. This case is here to review the judgment of the judge of the superior court in dismissing a writ of certiorari upon the ground that it had not been properly served. The court properly dismissed the certiorari. See Bass v. Milledgeville, 121 Ga. 152 (48 S. E. 919), and eases there cited.
2. It being clearly apparent that the bill of exceptions was prosecuted in this court for delay only, the statutory damages of ten per cent. (Civil Code of 1910, § 6213) are awarded to the defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Hicks, 119 S.E. 437, 31 Ga. App. 43, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 715 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
119 S.E. 437 (Johnson v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fisher v. City of Atlanta
442 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
City of Atlanta v. Saunders
284 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Peacock v. American Plant Co.
175 S.E. 262 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)