Johnson v. Herron

Alabama Court of Appeals

Johnson v. Herron

141 So. 360, 25 Ala. App. 83, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 91

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1932

Docket8 Div. 409.

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 360 (Johnson v. Herron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Herron, 141 So. 360, 25 Ala. App. 83, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 91 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

This was a detinue suit brought by appellee against appellant for the recovery of the possession of a certain Pord truck.

We have no fault to find with the action of the court in ordering a writ of detinue to be substituted in the cause, the testimony sufficiently showing the loss of the original, etc. Code 1923, § 10132.

It appears, without dispute, that appellee held a valid unpaid mortgage upon the identical truck sued for; and his right to recover is not shown to be controverted by any evidence in the case. Tallassee Motor Co. et al. v. Gilliland Bros., 22 Ala. App. 21, 112 So. 758; certiorari denied 216 Ala. 257, 112 So. 759.

This being true, any technical errors committed during the progress of the trial — -we not saying such were, or were not, committed —would not suffice for a reversal of the judgment appealed from. Supreme Court Rule 45.

It is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI