Johnson v. Herbert
45 Tex. 304
Opinion
The court erred in dismissing the petition, upon the ground of a want of jurisdiction, on account of the defendants being alleged to be non-residents. It was alleged that one of the defendants had property within the jurisdiction of the court. (Wilson v. Zeigler, 44 Tex., 657.)
It is not to be understood that this decision reaches the [305]*305merits of the case, as made by the petition, as to both of the defendants, it being made exclusively upon the question of jurisdiction.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Herbert, 45 Tex. 304 (Tex. 1876).
45 Tex. 304 (Johnson v. Herbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mabee v. McDonald
175 S.W. 676 (Texas Supreme Court, 1915)
Murphy v. Wallace
3 Willson 509 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1888)
Preston v. Walsh
10 F. 315 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1882)
Weems v. Miles & Rainer
1 White & W. 688 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1881)