Johnson v. Herbert
This text of 45 Tex. 304 (Johnson v. Herbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court erred in dismissing the petition, upon the ground of a want of jurisdiction, on account of the defendants being alleged to be non-residents. It was alleged that one of the defendants had property within the jurisdiction of the court. (Wilson v. Zeigler, 44 Tex., 657.)
It is not to be understood that this decision reaches the [305]*305merits of the case, as made by the petition, as to both of the defendants, it being made exclusively upon the question of jurisdiction.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 Tex. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-herbert-tex-1876.