Johnson v. Henrico County Government

539 F. App'x 219
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 11, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 539 F. App'x 219 (Johnson v. Henrico County Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Henrico County Government, 539 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Henrico Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:13-cv-00286-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. June 19, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Herrerra Pena
742 F.3d 508 (First Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 F. App'x 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-henrico-county-government-ca4-2013.