Johnson v. Henrico County Government

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Henrico County Government

539 F. App'x 219

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2013·No. No. 13-1853·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Henrico Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:13-cv-00286-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. June 19, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Henrico Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:13-cv-00286-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. June 19, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Henrico County Government, 539 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

539 F. App'x 219 (Johnson v. Henrico County Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related