Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive
This text of Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive (Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On September 9, 2010, Commissioner Linda Cheatham by Order denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's appeal and denied plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his record on appeal. Plaintiff appealed from Commissioner Cheatham's September 9, 2010, Order.
Upon review of the procedural history in this matter, the Full Commission HEREBY VACATES Commissioner Cheatham's September 9, 2010, Order. Pursuant to the North *Page 2 Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, after Commissioner Meyer's Order dismissing his appeal was affirmed by the Full Commission, plaintiff's legal recourse was to file a petition for writ ofcertiorari with the Court of Appeals. Rule 21, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure. Plaintiff lost the right to prosecute his appeal by his failure to take timely action. Id. Therefore, plaintiff's appeal was not properly before Commissioner Cheatham and is considered by the Full Commission panel only to the extent that Commissioner Cheatham's Order is VACATED.
Any further appeal by plaintiff must be filed at the North Carolina Court of Appeals in the form of a petition for writ of certiorari.
This 8th day of March, 2011.
S/___________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/_____________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
S/_____________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-hendrick-automotive-ncworkcompcom-2011.