Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group

471 F. App'x 192
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 2012
DocketNos. 12-1217, 12-1241
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 471 F. App'x 192 (Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Hendrick Automotive Group, 471 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment on his employment discrimination claims, denying his motions to reconsider, and dismissing identical employment discrimination claims as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error or evidence of judicial bias. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Hendrick Auto. Group, No. 3:10-cv-00109-FDW, 2011 WL 1696987 (W.D.N.C. May 3, 2011), 2011 WL 6032706 (Dec. 5, 2011), & 2012 WL 525478 (Feb. 16, 2012); Johnson v. Hendrick Auto. Group, No. 3:11-cv-00389-FDW-DCK, 2012 WL 525478 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2012). We deny Johnson’s motions for the preparation of transcripts at government expense and to reconsider the order consolidating his appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. United States of America
D. South Carolina, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-hendrick-automotive-group-ca4-2012.