Johnson v. Hendley
5 Munf. 219, 5 Va. 219, 1816 Va. LEXIS 37
Opinion
[220]*220In this Court, the following opinion and decree were pronounced, November 9th, 1816 :
“ The Court, not concurring in opinion with the Court of “ Chancery that this case is proper for the jurisdiction of a “ Court of Law in exclusion of that of a Court of Equity, re- “ verses the Decree, which on that ground dismisses the Bill; “ but, there being a great mass of testimony, exhibited in the “ case, the weight of which the Court is incompetent to decide “ on, without the intervention of a Jury, this Court, proceed- “ ing to give that Decree, which ought to have been rendered “ by the Court of Chancery, directs an issue to try whether “ the fraud, alleged, in the Bill to have been practised, and “ which is made the ground thereof, was perpetrated by the. “ Appellee, or not.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Hendley, 5 Munf. 219, 5 Va. 219, 1816 Va. LEXIS 37 (Va. 1816).
5 Munf. 219 (Johnson v. Hendley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prewett v. Citizens National Bank of Parkersburg
66 S.E. 231 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)
Smith's v. Cockrell
66 Ala. 64 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Bradford v. Rogers
2 Posey 57 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)
Phippen v. Durham
8 Va. 457 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)