Johnson v. Henderson

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Henderson

4 F. App'x 209

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2001·No. No. 00-2395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roland D. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Henderson, No. CA-00-2747-AMD (D.Md. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roland D. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Henderson, No. CA-00-2747-AMD (D.Md. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Henderson, 4 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

4 F. App'x 209 (Johnson v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.