Johnson v. Harrison Hardware & Furniture Co.

152 So. 768, 119 Fla. 470, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1006
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 12, 1935·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the *471 judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and. adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Harrison Hardware & Furniture Co., 152 So. 768, 119 Fla. 470, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1006 (Fla. 1935).

152 So. 768 (Johnson v. Harrison Hardware & Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business Cases
116 So. 3d 284 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
ARDC Corp. v. Hogan
656 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
In re Kessler Manufacturing Corp.
109 B.R. 516 (S.D. Florida, 1989)
Jankowski v. Taylor, Bishop & Lee
269 S.E.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Ursaner v. Wolfer
141 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Petty & Riddle, Inc. v. Lunt
138 P.2d 648 (Utah Supreme Court, 1942)
Sickler v. Indian River Abstract & Guaranty Co.
195 So. 195 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Baker v. Hanchett
134 S.W.2d 407 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Webb v. Powell
87 F.2d 983 (Fifth Circuit, 1937)