Johnson v. Harris

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MARLON JOHNSON ) CASE NO.: 1:23-cv-01365 ) Petitioner, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) v. ) ) WARDEN CHAE HARRIS ) ORDER ) ) Respondent. ) This matter came before the Court on Petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”) (Doc. 1) and Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Case as Time-Barred (Doc. 12). This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss the Petition. Doc. 17. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Petitioner did not file an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Petition is DISMISSED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED. September 18, 2024 /s/ Judge John R. Adams Date JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE