Johnson v. Harris

102 S.E. 133, 24 Ga. App. 689, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 456
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1920
Docket10945
StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 133 (Johnson v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Harris, 102 S.E. 133, 24 Ga. App. 689, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 456 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This was a suit upon a promissory note. The only defense' filed was the plea of payment, and upon this issue of fact the evidence amply supported the verdict for the plaintiff. Under the' facts of tho case the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are wholly without merit; and it appearing to this court that the writ of error must have been prosecuted for delay only, the prayer of the defendant in error that ten per cent, damages ’ be assessed against the plaintiff in error is granted.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 133, 24 Ga. App. 689, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-harris-gactapp-1920.