Johnson v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Johnson v. Harris

79 S.E. 588, 13 Ga. App. 618, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 274

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 21, 1913

Docket4933

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 79 S.E. 588 (Johnson v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Harris, 79 S.E. 588, 13 Ga. App. 618, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

A writ of habeas corpus was sued out to test the validity of a sentence imposed by a municipal court, requiring the prisoner to serve thirty days in the city chain-gang. He began to serve the sentence on April 19, the habeas corpus proceeding was heard on May 5, and he was remanded to the custody of the city marshal, to serve out his sentence. A writ of error was sued out to this court on May 10, but it does not appear that any supersedeas of the judgment remanding the prisoner into the custody of the marshal was obtained. The case was called and argued in the Court of Appeals on June 9. It must, therefore, be assumed that, when the case was reached in this court, the sentence had been satisfied. The questions raised for decision have become moot and will not be decided. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

A writ of habeas corpus was sued out to test the validity of a sentence imposed by a municipal court, requiring the prisoner to serve thirty days in the city chain-gang. He began to serve the sentence on April 19, the habeas corpus proceeding was heard on May 5, and he was remanded to the custody of the city marshal, to serve out his sentence. A writ of error was sued out to this court on May 10, but it does not appear that any supersedeas of the judgment remanding the prisoner into the custody of the marshal was obtained. The case was called and argued in the Court of Appeals on June 9. It must, therefore, be assumed that, when the case was reached in this court, the sentence had been satisfied. The questions raised for decision have become moot and will not be decided. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.E. 588, 13 Ga. App. 618, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-harris-gactapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack