Johnson v. Harriet Mills, Inc.

144 S.E. 534, 196 N.C. 93, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 287
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 26, 1928·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Oubiam.

C. S., 900, provides that “where a corporation is a party to the action, this examination may be made of any of its officers or agents.” When no pleadings have been filed the plaintiff by proper and sufficient affidavit may apply to the court for an order of examination. Bailey v. Matthews, 156 N. C., 78, 72 S. E., 92; Fields v. Coleman, 1 60 N. C., 11, 75 S. E., 1005; Chesson v. Bank, 190 N. C., 187, 129 S. E., 403. And when a proper order for such examination has been duly made, an appeal therefrom to the Supreme Court is premature and will be dismissed. Ward v. Martin, 175 N. C., 287, 95 S. E., 621; Monroe v. Holder, 182 N. C., 79, 108 S. E., 359; Abbitt v. Gregory, ante, 9.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Harriet Mills, Inc., 144 S.E. 534, 196 N.C. 93, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 287 (N.C. 1928).

144 S.E. 534 (Johnson v. Harriet Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Blount
187 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Fox v. . Yarborough
35 S.E.2d 885 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Washington v. Safe Bus, Inc.
15 S.E.2d 372 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Knight v. . Little
9 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Douglas v. . Buchanan
191 S.E. 736 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
188 S.E. 390 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Hagedorn v. . Hagedorn
185 S.E. 768 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.
166 S.E. 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Pruitt v. . Wood
156 S.E. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)