Johnson v. Harold Cushshon Realty, Inc.

888 S.W.2d 765, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1957, 1994 WL 705391
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. 65916·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Virgil Johnson, Jr., appeals from the St. Louis City Circuit Court’s decision granting summary judgment to respondents, Harold Cushshon Realty, Inc. and Ira Young, on appellant’s motion to set aside respondents’ purchase of appellant’s property at a foreclosure sale. We affirm. Appellant suffered no damages from the court’s dismissal of his petition to set aside the foreclosure sale, as that sale had already been declared void by the court in an earlier proceeding. Appellant’s motion was therefore moot and failed to state a cause of action. Respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

As we find no error of law, and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Harold Cushshon Realty, Inc., 888 S.W.2d 765, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1957, 1994 WL 705391 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

888 S.W.2d 765 (Johnson v. Harold Cushshon Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.