Johnson v. Harley

48 S.E. 685, 121 Ga. 83, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 20
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 17, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 48 S.E. 685 (Johnson v. Harley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Harley, 48 S.E. 685, 121 Ga. 83, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Lamar, J.

Whether the plaintiff’s remedy was in trover, or for breach of the warranty, depended on the question as to whether there had been any fraud by the defendant. If there was a mere warranty, title passed. A breach did not void the sale. If there was a fraudulent representation which induced the plaintiff to act to his injury, no title passed, and he could sue in trover. The evidence was conflicting, hut that for the plaintiff was suffi-. cient to sustain the -verdict, either under Dawson v. Pennaman, 65 Ga. 698, Barnett v. Spier, 93 Ga. 762, or Newman v. Claflin, 107 Ga. 89. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manship v. Newsome
198 S.E. 428 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
Yeomans v. Jones
188 S.E. 62 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Dove v. Roberts & Co.
178 S.E. 169 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Barfield v. Farkas
150 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Snellgrove v. Dingelhoef
103 S.E. 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Metcalf Live Stock Co. v. Short
99 S.E. 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Battle v. Livingston
95 S.E. 314 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Davis & Co. v. Preston
76 S.E. 766 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 S.E. 685, 121 Ga. 83, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-harley-ga-1904.