Johnson v. Gulf & Chicago Railroad
This text of 82 Miss. 452 (Johnson v. Gulf & Chicago Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
If the appellee could have sued in his own name in trover under 26 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (1st ed.), p. 755, and note to Harker v. Dement, 52 Am. Dec., 678, 679, it could waive the tort and sue for value, and averment and proof of the assignment by Taylor were unnecessary. But we think the evidence shows such assignment by Taylor of his interest as carried his right to sue, even if such right did not exist before. The case of Gabbert v. Wallace, 66 Miss., 618, 5 South., 394, is not similar to this. The case before us is not the case of assignment of debt secured by trust deed. We think the damages sufficiently shown.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 Miss. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-gulf-chicago-railroad-miss-1903.