Johnson v. Guernsey

205 A.D. 423, 199 N.Y.S. 571, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a motion to permit defendants to file exceptions to decision nunc pro tunc. Power is given the Supreme Court to entertain this motion in section 98 of the Civil Practice Act. While this motion should have been made to the Special Term, we have unquestionable power to entertain it (Matter of Barkley, 42 App. Div. 597; Matter of Mitchel v. Cropsey, 177 id. 663) and will do so in this particular instance to complete the record and expedite the appeal. The omission was due to a misreading of the referee’s letter, and the delay has not prejudiced the defendants. In the interests of justice the omission should be supplied.

[424]*424The motion, therefore, should be granted upon payment to the plaintiff of ten dollars costs.

All concur.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellants shall file and serve printed briefs by May twelfth and be ready for argument on May fifteenth. Motion to permit defendants to file exceptions to decision nunc pro tunc granted, upon payment to the plaintiff of ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Guernsey, 205 A.D. 423, 199 N.Y.S. 571, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

205 A.D. 423 (Johnson v. Guernsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barkley v. New York Centrall & Hudson River Railroad
42 A.D. 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)