Johnson v. Guernsey

205 A.D. 423, 199 N.Y.S. 571, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037

This text of 205 A.D. 423 (Johnson v. Guernsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Guernsey, 205 A.D. 423, 199 N.Y.S. 571, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a motion to permit defendants to file exceptions to decision nunc pro tunc. Power is given the Supreme Court to entertain this motion in section 98 of the Civil Practice Act. While this motion should have been made to the Special Term, we have unquestionable power to entertain it (Matter of Barkley, 42 App. Div. 597; Matter of Mitchel v. Cropsey, 177 id. 663) and will do so in this particular instance to complete the record and expedite the appeal. The omission was due to a misreading of the referee’s letter, and the delay has not prejudiced the defendants. In the interests of justice the omission should be supplied.

[424]*424The motion, therefore, should be granted upon payment to the plaintiff of ten dollars costs.

All concur.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellants shall file and serve printed briefs by May twelfth and be ready for argument on May fifteenth. Motion to permit defendants to file exceptions to decision nunc pro tunc granted, upon payment to the plaintiff of ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barkley v. New York Centrall & Hudson River Railroad
42 A.D. 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D. 423, 199 N.Y.S. 571, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-guernsey-nyappdiv-1923.