Johnson v. Griswold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Griswold

24 A.D.2d 1002, 266 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2818

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 1002 (Johnson v. Griswold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Griswold, 24 A.D.2d 1002, 266 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions to recover damages for wrongful death (Action No. 1) and for personal injury (Action No. 2), the defendant and third-party plaintiff Ruth Griswold appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 21, 1964, and from an amended judgment of said court, entered December 7, 1964 (a) upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and (b) upon the court’s decision, dismissing her third-party complaints against the third-party defendant Kroecker Building Corp. Amended judgment reversed on the facts, with costs to abide the event and new trial granted. In our opinion, the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Appeal from original judgment dismissed; said judgment was superseded by the amended judgment. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, ITopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions to recover damages for wrongful death (Action No. 1) and for personal injury (Action No. 2), the defendant and third-party plaintiff Ruth Griswold appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 21, 1964, and from an amended judgment of said court, entered December 7, 1964 (a) upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and (b) upon the court’s decision, dismissing her third-party complaints against the third-party defendant Kroecker Building Corp. Amended judgment reversed on the facts, with costs to abide the event and new trial granted. In our opinion, the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Appeal from original judgment dismissed; said judgment was superseded by the amended judgment. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, ITopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 1002, 266 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-griswold-nyappdiv-1965.