Johnson v. Gregory County Auditor (In Re Johnson)

Eighth Circuit

Johnson v. Gregory County Auditor (In Re Johnson)

402 B.R. 313, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 354, 2009 WL 605854

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 2009

Docket09-6005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 402 B.R. 313 (Johnson v. Gregory County Auditor (In Re Johnson)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Gregory County Auditor (In Re Johnson), 402 B.R. 313, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 354, 2009 WL 605854 (bap8 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order denying a motion for a default judgment and dismissing an adver *314 sary complaint seeking damages for alleged violations of the automatic stay or discharge injunction. 1 We dismiss the appeal.

Although the caption names the Debtor, Rodney Arthur Johnson, as the Plaintiff-Appellant, Mr. Johnson is not a party to this appeal, nor was he a party to the adversary proceeding, because he died before the complaint was filed in September 2008. Douglas Kettering, the attorney who represented the Debtor in his bankruptcy case prior to his death, filed the underlying adversary proceeding as well as this appeal.

Mr. Kettering has not shown that he has any authority or standing to pursue this appeal, or to bring the underlying adversary action, after the death of his client. The attorney-client relationship between Mr. Kettering and the Debtor terminated upon the Debtor’s death. 7A C.J.S. Attorney & Client § 274 (2008). See also Kasting v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 196 F.R.D. 595, 598 (D.Kan.2000). An attorney cannot file a suggestion of death on behalf of a former client, let alone initiate an adversary proceeding or pursue an appeal. Id.; In re Klein, 36 B.R. 390, 392 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984).

In the absence of any proof that Mr. Kettering has been appointed as the attorney or representative of the Debtor’s probate estate, Mr. Kettering does not have standing to pursue this appeal (nor did he have standing to initiate the underlying adversary action). We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Jones v. Gale, 470 F.3d 1261, 1265 (8th Cir.2006) (standing is a prerequisite to subject matter jurisdiction).

Appeal dismissed.

1

. Honorable Charles L. Nail, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Court, District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order denying a motion for a default judgment and dismissing an adver *314 sary complaint seeking damages for alleged violations of the automatic stay or discharge injunction. 1 We dismiss the appeal.

Although the caption names the Debtor, Rodney Arthur Johnson, as the Plaintiff-Appellant, Mr. Johnson is not a party to this appeal, nor was he a party to the adversary proceeding, because he died before the complaint was filed in September 2008. Douglas Kettering, the attorney who represented the Debtor in his bankruptcy case prior to his death, filed the underlying adversary proceeding as well as this appeal.

Mr. Kettering has not shown that he has any authority or standing to pursue this appeal, or to bring the underlying adversary action, after the death of his client. The attorney-client relationship between Mr. Kettering and the Debtor terminated upon the Debtor’s death. 7A C.J.S. Attorney & Client § 274 (2008). See also Kasting v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 196 F.R.D. 595, 598 (D.Kan.2000). An attorney cannot file a suggestion of death on behalf of a former client, let alone initiate an adversary proceeding or pursue an appeal. Id.; In re Klein, 36 B.R. 390, 392 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984).

In the absence of any proof that Mr. Kettering has been appointed as the attorney or representative of the Debtor’s probate estate, Mr. Kettering does not have standing to pursue this appeal (nor did he have standing to initiate the underlying adversary action). We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Jones v. Gale, 470 F.3d 1261, 1265 (8th Cir.2006) (standing is a prerequisite to subject matter jurisdiction).

Appeal dismissed.

1

. Honorable Charles L. Nail, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Court, District of South Dakota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

402 B.R. 313, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 354, 2009 WL 605854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-gregory-county-auditor-in-re-johnson-bap8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack