Johnson v. Grand Union Co.

158 A.D.2d 517, 551 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1780
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 158 A.D.2d 517 (Johnson v. Grand Union Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Grand Union Co., 158 A.D.2d 517, 551 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

The plaintiff Henry Johnson, a security guard who had worked at the defendant store for several months prior to the accident, fell on some corn silk as he was walking down the produce aisle. Testimony at trial indicated that the floor was swept on the day of the accident and that the store had a policy that all employees had to immediately pick up any item they saw on the floor. There was no testimony that any debris was observed on the floor by anyone prior to the accident. In addition, the general manager testified that he had walked down the aisle one half of an hour prior to the accident without seeing anything on the floor. After the plaintiffs rested, the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that a prima facie case had not been established. We agree.

[518]*518In order to establish a prima facie case, a plaintiffs evidence must establish "(1) the existence of a duty on defendant’s part as to plaintiff; (2) a breach of this duty; and (3) injury to the plaintiff as a result thereof" (Akins v Glens Falls City School Dist., 53 NY2d 325, 333; Benjamin v City of New York, 99 AD2d 995, affd 64 NY2d 44; Ehlinger v Board of Educ., 96 AD2d 708; see also, Prosser, Torts § 30, at 143 [4th ed]). Here, there was no evidence that the defendant created the dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of it. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed (see, Eddy v Tops Friendly Mkts., 91 AD2d 1203, affd 59 NY2d 692). Mollen, P. J., Eiber, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. City of New York
255 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Merino v.New York City Transit Authority
218 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Melton v. E.P.S. Hair Design, Inc.
202 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Maschio v. Builders Transport, Inc.
201 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Peterson v. Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.
199 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 517, 551 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-grand-union-co-nyappdiv-1990.