Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS

Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS

687 N.W.2d 295, 471 Mich. 888
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 2004
Docket125333
StatusPublished

This text of 687 N.W.2d 295 (Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS, 687 N.W.2d 295, 471 Mich. 888 (Mich. 2004).

Opinion

687 N.W.2d 295 (2004)

Johnson
v.
Grand Haven Stamped Products.

No. 125333.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 30, 2004.

SC: 125333, COA: 250236.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2003 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal to revisit Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Paific Tea Co., 462 Mich. 691, 614 N.W.2d 607 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
614 N.W.2d 607 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 N.W.2d 295, 471 Mich. 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-grand-haven-stamped-products-mich-2004.