Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS
687 N.W.2d 295, 471 Mich. 888
Opinion
Johnson
v.
Grand Haven Stamped Products.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 125333, COA: 250236.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2003 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal to revisit Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Paific Tea Co., 462 Mich. 691, 614 N.W.2d 607 (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS, 687 N.W.2d 295, 471 Mich. 888 (Mich. 2004).
687 N.W.2d 295 (Johnson v. GRAND HAVEN STAMPED PRODUCTS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
614 N.W.2d 607 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)