Johnson v. Goldsborough
1 H. & J. 499
Opinion
It appears to the court that the writ of error bond is not a supersedeas, and that the writ of capias ad satisfaciendum may issue, subject to [501]*501any objections which the defendant may make thereto lipón the return thereof.
CA. SA. ORDERED ACCORDINGLY.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Goldsborough, 1 H. & J. 499 (Va. Super. Ct. 1804).
1 H. & J. 499 (Johnson v. Goldsborough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'DONNELL v. McGann
529 A.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Tucker v. State ex rel. Kneighton
11 Md. 322 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1857)
Ringgold's Case
1 Md. Ch. 5 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1824)