Johnson v. Goldsborough
1 H. & J. 499
This text of 1 H. & J. 499 (Johnson v. Goldsborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnson v. Goldsborough, 1 H. & J. 499 (Va. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
It appears to the court that the writ of error bond is not a supersedeas, and that the writ of capias ad satisfaciendum may issue, subject to [501]*501any objections which the defendant may make thereto lipón the return thereof.
CA. SA. ORDERED ACCORDINGLY.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'DONNELL v. McGann
529 A.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Tucker v. State ex rel. Kneighton
11 Md. 322 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1857)
Ringgold's Case
1 Md. Ch. 5 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1824)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 H. & J. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-goldsborough-vagensess-1804.