Johnson v. Gibson

457 S.W.2d 114, 1970 Tex. App. LEXIS 2760
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 25, 1970
DocketNo. 7176
StatusPublished

This text of 457 S.W.2d 114 (Johnson v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Gibson, 457 S.W.2d 114, 1970 Tex. App. LEXIS 2760 (Tex. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Relator’s amended motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus, together with the replies of Respondents thereto, having been considered by the court, it is ORDERED that leave to file such petition be [115]*115and the same is denied and refused. Rule 383. Relator has a complete and adequate remedy at law, Article 2324, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., and may not invoke our original jurisdiction under such circumstances. Boothe v. Nelson, 321 S.W.2d 321 (Amarillo, Tex.Civ.App., 1959, original proceedings). Furthermore, Respondent Gibson has indicated a willingness to perform the duty imposed by statute. Lane v. Ross, 151 Tex. 268, 249 S.W.2d 591, 593 (1952). We express no opinion upon the merits, if any, of the controversy which is made the basis of these proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boothe v. Nelson
321 S.W.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Lane v. Ross
249 S.W.2d 591 (Texas Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
457 S.W.2d 114, 1970 Tex. App. LEXIS 2760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-gibson-texapp-1970.