Johnson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

27 S.E. 681, 102 Ga. 577, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 611
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 10, 1897·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Under the provisions of section 5585 of the Civil Code, the first grant of a new trial by a trial judge, whether upon general or special grounds, will not be disturbed, unless upon looking through the record of the entire case it can be judicially determined, not only that the judge abused his discretion, but that upon the record as a whole the verdict as to each material issue involved in the case was demanded by the law and the evidence.

Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed. Cross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Msh, J., disqualified. Action for damages. Before Judge Eve. City court of Richmond county. May term, 1896. Henry 0. Roney, for plaintiff. Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming, for defendant..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 27 S.E. 681, 102 Ga. 577, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 611 (Ga. 1897).

27 S.E. 681 (Johnson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Telecable of Columbus, Inc.
232 S.E.2d 100 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Sailors v. Spainhour
106 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
National Bellas-Hess Co. v. Patrick
175 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Bluestein v. Amason
174 S.E. 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Smith v. Perry
168 S.E. 770 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western Railroad
33 S.E. 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Carolee v. Handelis
29 S.E. 935 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)