Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2021
Docket0:21-cv-61325
StatusUnknown

This text of Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections (Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections, (S.D. Fla. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 21-cv-61325-BLOOM

ERIC L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent. / ORDER ON DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Petitioner Eric L. Johnson’s (“Petitioner”) Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF No. [3] (“Declaration”). On June 18, 2021, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a Person in State Custody, ECF No. [1] (“Petition”).1 A petitioner that wishes to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in a § 2254 action must file “a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the institution.” Rule 3(a)(2), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases (alteration added). Furthermore, any motion for leave to proceed IFP filed in conjunction with a § 2254 petition shall be submitted on the Court’s form IFP application “or an affidavit which substantially follows the form.” S.D. Fla. L.R. 88.2(b).

1 “Under the prison mailbox rule, a pro se prisoner’s court filing is deemed filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing.” Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1290 n.2 (11th Cir. 2009) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Case No. 21-cv-61325-BLOOM

Here, Petitioner filed a Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis that substantially follows the Court’s form affidavit. However, Petitioner did not file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, nor did he file the required Rule 3(a)(2) certificate. Accordingly, itis ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Petitioner Eric L. Johnson’s Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF No. [3], is DENIED without prejudice. 2. Onor before July 28, 2021, Petitioner shall either pay the Clerk’s filing fee of $5.00 or, in the alternative, shall file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with supporting financial affidavit, and the six-month account statement in accordance with Rule 3(a) of the Rules Governing $2254 Proceedings in the District Courts. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide Petitioner with a copy of the in forma pauperis form alongside this Order. 4. If Petitioner pays the filing fee, the payment must bear Case No. 21-cv-61325-BB so the fee will be docketed in the correct case. This is especially important where Petitioner has filed more than one case. 5. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miany ada, on June 28, 2021.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Counsel of Record

Eric L. Johnson, Pro Se #779161 Moore Haven Correctional Facility Inmate Mail/Parcels Post Office Box 719001 Moore Haven, FL 33471

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. McNeil
557 F.3d 1287 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-florida-department-of-corrections-flsd-2021.