Johnson v. Flanders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Johnson v. Flanders

89 S.E.2d 829, 92 Ga. App. 697, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 690

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 6, 1955

Docket35884, 35888

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 829 (Johnson v. Flanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Flanders, 89 S.E.2d 829, 92 Ga. App. 697, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 690 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, J.

1. The deeds having been executed and delivered by the grantor during her life, conveying a present estate to the grantees named in them, wez’e not testaznentary in their nature (Mays v. Fletcher, 137 Ga. 27 (1), 72 S. E. 408; Shelton v. Edenfield, 148 Ga. 128, 96 S. E. 3), and conveyed to each of the childz’en a vested remainder iziterest in lands.

2. The condition or provision contained in each of the deeds that the grantee hold for his or her lifetizne and not sell, transfer, assign, or encuznber it without the consent of the grantor’s other children was repugnant to the estate granted, and for that reason legally ineffectual. Farkas v. Farkas, 200 Ga. 886 (2) (38 S. E. 2d 924).

3. Had the provision or condition referred to in the preceding division been a valid restriction upon the right of the grantee to dispose of the property during his or her life, that one of the grantees made a testamentary disposition of his interest did not violate the condition.

4. The wife became a tenant in common with the other gz’antees, and was entitled to institute partition proceedings to have the lands divided according to the provisions of Code Ch. 85-15.

Judgments affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI