Johnson v. First Federal Savings & Loan

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. First Federal Savings & Loan

60 F. App'x 439

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2003·No. 02-2243·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Lee Johnson appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders converting his bankruptcy case to one under Chapter 7 and lifting the automatic stay. We have reviewed the *440 record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan, Nos. CA-02-78-4; BK-01-1457-WA4-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gary Lee Johnson appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders converting his bankruptcy case to one under Chapter 7 and lifting the automatic stay. We have reviewed the *440 record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan, Nos. CA-02-78-4; BK-01-1457-WA4-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. First Federal Savings & Loan, 60 F. App'x 439 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 439 (Johnson v. First Federal Savings & Loan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.