Johnson v. Fargo

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Fargo

532 F. App'x 414

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 12, 2013·No. No. 13-1551·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. l:13-cv[415]*41500419-LMB-IDD (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. l:13-cv[415]*41500419-LMB-IDD (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Fargo, 532 F. App'x 414 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

532 F. App'x 414 (Johnson v. Fargo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related