Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church

560 F. App'x 174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2173
StatusPublished

This text of 560 F. App'x 174 (Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church, 560 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished Per Curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and Johnson’s informal brief on appeal, and we conclude that this appeal is frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church, No. 1:13-cv-00430-AJT-IDD (E.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2013). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ebenezer-baptist-church-ca4-2014.