Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church
This text of 560 F. App'x 174 (Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished Per Curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and Johnson’s informal brief on appeal, and we conclude that this appeal is frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church, No. 1:13-cv-00430-AJT-IDD (E.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2013). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
560 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ebenezer-baptist-church-ca4-2014.