Johnson v. Dunbar

282 A.D. 720, 122 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4788
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1953·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In an action for judgment declaring an easement to property situated without the State, order dismissing the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, Section 536 of the Real Property Law does not govern an action for damages with respect to real property admittedly not owned by the plaintiff but as to which he merely asserts that he has an implied easement of access. To retain jurisdiction of such an action would be tantamount to making an adjudication with respect to title of land without the State. Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Beldoek, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, the third cause of action is one contemplated by section 536 of the Real Property Law and may be entertained even though a question of title is involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Dunbar, 282 A.D. 720, 122 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 720 (Johnson v. Dunbar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weiss v. Weiss
186 A.D.2d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
BD. OF T. OF INT. IMP. TRUST F. v. Mobil Oil
455 So. 2d 412 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Ralske v. Ralske
85 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Sarrica v. Sarrica
41 A.D.2d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Lawrence v. Lawrence
47 Misc. 2d 10 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Broaddus v. Vanadium Corp. of America
19 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)