Johnson v. Dunbar
This text of 282 A.D. 720 (Johnson v. Dunbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for judgment declaring an easement to property situated without the State, order dismissing the complaint affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, Section 536 of the Real Property Law does not govern an action for damages with respect to real property admittedly not owned by the plaintiff but as to which he merely asserts that he has an implied easement of access. To retain jurisdiction of such an action would be tantamount to making an adjudication with respect to title of land without the State. Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Beldoek, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, the third cause of action is one contemplated by section 536 of the Real Property Law and may be entertained even though a question of title is involved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 720, 122 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-dunbar-nyappdiv-1953.