Johnson v. Douglas
1931 OK 184, 298 P. 592, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 881
Opinion
In this case substantially the same state of facts are pleaded as in En-le-te-ke. et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this case, with others, was consolidated.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Douglas, 1931 OK 184, 298 P. 592, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 881 (Okla. 1931).
1931 OK 184 (Johnson v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White Oak Refining Co. v. Whitehead
1931 OK 357 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
En-Le-Te-Ke v. Beasley
1931 OK 176 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)