Johnson v. Douglas

1931 OK 184, 298 P. 592, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 881
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 28, 1931
Docket19943
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK 184 (Johnson v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Douglas, 1931 OK 184, 298 P. 592, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 881 (Okla. 1931).

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts are pleaded as in En-le-te-ke. et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this case, with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CTJLLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White Oak Refining Co. v. Whitehead
1931 OK 357 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
En-Le-Te-Ke v. Beasley
1931 OK 176 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK 184, 298 P. 592, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-douglas-okla-1931.