Johnson v. Dixon

128 S.E.2d 332, 218 Ga. 446, 1962 Ga. LEXIS 525
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 22, 1962
Docket21831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 S.E.2d 332 (Johnson v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Dixon, 128 S.E.2d 332, 218 Ga. 446, 1962 Ga. LEXIS 525 (Ga. 1962).

Opinion

Quillian, Justice.

According to the petition-the resolution terminating the services of the secretary and investigator assigned to the plaintiff’s office went into effect and became operative prior to the institution of the action. Plainly, from the averments of the petition, the Commissioners had, before the action was brought, made the change in the status of the clerical and investigative help furnished the Solicitor General’s office. The established rule of equity applicable in the circumstances shown by the petition is that an accomplished or completed act will not be enjoined. In Clay v. Smith, 215 Ga. 668, 669 (112 SE2d 767), is the pronouncement: “It is -axiomatic that a court of equity will not grant an injunction to restrain a single act which has been fully completed prior to the restraint sought.”

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Board of Commissioners
194 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E.2d 332, 218 Ga. 446, 1962 Ga. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-dixon-ga-1962.